Printable View
Having lost almost 700 ships, of which 300 was battleships I find the planet defenses bonkers. We can't deal with them until really late game is silly, undefended planets should fall easy, people should be rewarded for playing, not just plopping down colonies and idling...*
This game is just too unfinished and suffer from poor mechanics to be really playable.
An undefended 400Mu planet takes 232 Battleshios to take. That's about a day or two of building Battleships for me. I don't think that's too extreme. The game plays great. Yes, some things should be improved. But I don't think Colony defense is one of them.
If you had 300 battleships and lost 700 ships, then it wasn't just the planets defenses that killed you, they must have had stationary defenses or their own fleet as well. I've captured homeworlds with a mixed force of about 500 cruisers and battlecruisers, much less battleships. And like ChickenHawk said, a battleship force to kill an otherwise undefended colony takes very little time to build (in terms of a 2 month game). A couple of days is nothing.
On the other hand, I do agree that the game seems unfinished in a lot of regards. Mainly in terms of visibility of information (trying to figure out where the heck you have harvesting/trade routes set up), the sheer number of steps it takes to actually DO anything, the inability to do things like automatically create a fleet from all ships of the same class in a system instead of having to fleet one, go into fleet view, add the rest, inability to give orders from fleet view, etc...
Well I had 300 battleships and 400 cruises, his defenses was gone I had still 500 ships, this is beyond the point tho, undefended planets should fall to a cruiser alone. Orbital defenses should be required thus an active player
I can build 100+ battleships in 4 hours. Once you have strong economy there is no problem in building ships or replacing them as needed. In fact I have built already 2285 ships (about 1000 battleships). The game does not require attacking other peoples colonies or home worlds. There are 5 ways to win this game. I do not think that mechanics are poor. To the contrary. The game is already well balanced with more improvements coming soon. Sure there are some things I wish there were done differently but nothing is a stopper for me.
Colonies have ground to space weapons, (Think Star Wars: The Empire Strikes Back) so it makes sense that a 400Mu planet would take a lot of shelling to kill all the resistance. Before attacking (if you know colony size) just multiply the Population (just the 3 digits) by 18 and then divide that by the ATK of one of your ships. That'll tell you how many ships of that kind you need to take the planet. Don't forget to add in Orbitals and other defending ships, if they have them.Quote:
Originally Posted by Strongbad
I agree with Strongbad, until they overhaul the mechanics, it's pretty difficult to take the game seriously.
SG7 and ChickenHawk, the two of you probably log more hours in this game than everyone else combined. You are online constantly. So for you to claim that the gameplay is balanced is also hard to take seriously. If you are building 100+ battleships in 4 hours, that means you have at least 10 full population colonies with enough RO at each to keep up production. Obviously, you are Traders, because neither other class has the faintest chance of keeping up with that rate.
As I was explaining to ChickenHawk just before he double crossed our alliance (haha), my entire objective on Nergal was to see how much RO I could collect as a Warlord without trading. I suspected it wasn't possible to reach 440k and I was right. Even with a number of Jovian outposts and rank 9 in Advanced Materials Collection, do you want to know how much RO I have? 34k. And that's with spending NONE of it along the way. I could have researched Capital Ship Construction days ago, but what would be the point? Build 5 dreads and then be completely broke?
Now, I was playing what I consider aggressively in terms of expansion, but obviously not even close to aggressively enough compared to what these guys are doing. Maybe the game just isn't for me, but if it's about crapping out outpost and colony ships 24/7 and micromanaging where they go, I'm not interested. I already spend more time on this game than I want to, if you want people like me to keep playing, you have to do more to level the playing field.
Here I am thinking I'm being productive building 4 battleships an hour, and then these guys talk this nonsense. It's silly.
Also, protip: Traders are broken.
Well, the RO production will be fixed when the combat revisions go in. My only question is what they're gonna do at that point to make traders still be competitive. If researchers and warlords don't need to trade to get RO, why the hell would they ever want to trade with a trader? Trader's will pretty much be left dead in the water until they manage to research tech to trade with enemies so that other players CAN'T refuse to trade with them, and they'll have to also research up to be able to build fleets to defend themselves at the same time. All while traders require a RIDICULOUS amount of ore to actually meet their win condition vs killing a few homeworlds as a warlord...
On a side note, is it possible to win with a victory condition from a different spec than you took? (Kill planets as a trader, trade enough ore as a warlord or researcher?)
And as I said in the other thread I started earlier today, doesn't matter if traders get so much more RO or CO than other players if you can only trade to win. I see exactly 0 possibility of actually being able to achieve the AMOUNT of ore you have to trade to actually win.
JetJaguar2000 - You are damn right how much time I have spent! In the first 10 days I probably logged in 100+ hours. I also have 155 planets. Did it come easy? No and no again! I play this game for the first time in my life. I had no idea how to play or what to do first when I started to play. I agree this game takes time. To think that one can win putting 10 minutes a day is nonsense. You cannot put this game on an autopilot. There is lot of decision to be made.
I am not saying that life is perfect. I am not saying that this game is perfect. There are always losers (lots of them) and winners. I am not sure how tough life is for Warlord and how easy life is for Trader since I am Researcher :)
Vander - I asked that question already. The dev said yes. You are a winner if you fulfill any winning condition.
Quote:
Originally Posted by JetJaguar2000
I agree with JetJaguar -- I am trying out a trader on another server and have already killed off one player by pking his planet with battleships simply because I went for them right away knowing from Irakalla that it can be done by a trader type. When I hear that one can build so many battleships that is only true of one of the character types with such impunity. I am playing my trader as a Warlord to prove the point - and can mess up any of the weaker or newer players I want to as long as I do not want to win as a trader. And even then I bet I have a shot if i kill off as many players I can or keep others busy while I search for the artifacts along the way.
I personally feel that there are two major areas that need effort right away. Balancing of character types and administrative tools. If one of these areas was working well I think it would be easier to be patient with the game. Listen.....we have no battle reports! That is not something small to have missing from a war type game. That is simply frustrating.
I like the devs - they listen and are involved. I hope the player base will still be around by the time things improve. I wish they had had more keys to have done a proper beta test.
This is where you're wrong. A well designed game could be played 10 minutes a day. And I disagree, there aren't really any significant decisions to be made in the game right now. The only real tactic is to swarm outpost and colony ships all over the place. Everything else is actually "autopilot" after that.Quote:
Originally Posted by SG7
Decisions can be made quickly. If the gameplay actually focused more on making meaningful decisions a few times a day, it would be much more interesting. Make it more strategic, more tactical. Right now it's just swarm outpost ships, build up more resources than the next guy, build huge stack of ships, and start smashing his planets. Even putting aside the issue with Traders, this style of gameplay rewards the guy who sits there 10 hours a day maximizing efficiency by not "wasting" any time offline.
Right off the top of my head, I can imagine a (somewhat artificial) mechanic that could sit right on top of the existing gameplay: Limit the number of orders you can give a ship/fleet/colony in a given day. Make it so that each order is meaningful and measured. This way everyone gets the same chance to take actions, and you don't gain an enormous advantage by being willing to sit around all day shuffling ships around.
Anyways, I know they are planning to add some stuff to limit land grabbing, which is good, but there is still more to do. I really can't stand the colony defense situation as implemented now. It is still too hard to do anything about colonies once they get big enough (unless you're one of these guys who builds 300 battleships per hour), and conversely once yours gets taken you have almost no chance to get it back. I severely dislike the whole "all or nothing," "rock paper scissors" vibe of attacking planets. I would much rather see a system where attacked colonies sustain "permanent" damage (of course you could "repair" as some kind of factory action) so that you don't risk suiciding huge fleets with no gain whatsoever if you miscalculate or mis-guess the strength of the defenses.
The way I'm seeing combat playing out is that you work in your little corner of the universe building up an empire, you put a decent amount of time in, you think you're doing ok, and then the next thing you now, someone shows up with a 500 ship fleet that you have no chance against, and the game is effectively over for you. It's dumb and boring if you're not willing to be the guy doing that.
JetJaguar2000 -I am not against changing the mechanics for this game. I am not against improvements. I did well with the current system by understanding its strong and weak points. That is it. Rules are rules. If game requires you to trade you have to trade. If game requires you to grab planets you have to do it. There is no other way to win. You cannot stop a running train with your bare hands.
It happened that I had some time on my hands. Would I prefer to play 10 minutes a day? Yes, I would.
I understand your point of view. All your points are valid points. They are worth serious consideration.
I just have difficulties to design or imagine a real time system where everyone has the same chance to win regardless of playing 10 hours, 10 minutes or 1 minute. Such system does not exist in real life.
The proposed new mechanisms and battle changes will make this game very different game.
For better I hope but I have no doubts that it is very difficult to please everyone.
Not to hijack this thread, but this certainly seems like it will affect how players in future games will approach the game. Doesn't that blur the lines between any of the three specialties? All Warlords will sign up as Traders, but fulfill the win condition of Warlords - so why have specialties at all, since already any specialty can research all tech requirements for all the other specialties, correct?Quote:
Originally Posted by SG7
I'll admit, this game isn't how I imagined it would be. I didn't realize how similar each of the three specialties would feel before I started. I thought Traders would be the ones out harvesting and trading - as in trading CO/RO to Warlords to power their armies in exchange for a peace treaty, protection or building defense systems; or by trading to Researchers for the Researchers to study and manipulate the CO/RO. And I thought researchers would be focused solely on research and sell that knowledge to Warlords to build armies or to Traders to improve their CO/RO accumulations. That sort of interaction. I didn't realize we would all end up doing virtually the same things - harvest routes, outposts, colony ships, trade routes, research queue.... repeat daily. I have tried playing each specialty type on different servers and unless I go to my research queue in each one, I could easily forget which win condition I was aiming for since all the procedures are basically the same.
And now it turns out I don't even need to know which specialty I signed up for.
Actually Wrath, you are partly correct. Traders can't build any warship larger than a Dreadnought. So they would be unable to defend against Warlords if the Warlord had enough RO to build them. With the new proposed changes to RO collection, it is Entirely possible that the trader will be rendered obsolete.
I'm working on a detailed post of things we have been discussing internally that will address stuff from this topic. Once I finish the write up offline I'll post something detailing some of our thoughts.
We have spent a lot of time listening to you all, and how the mechanics work. With the new battle simulator coded, and running tons of simulations we have discovered several weaknesses in the system, and are working very hard on trying to come up with the final info on the changes we are looking at.
We certainly want your feedback on the info, it will help us make sure this is a game you all look forward to playing. Getting the balance down so it plays smoothly is #1 on our list before we start adding anything else.
Each speciality gets unique skills and bonuses. They are not the same.Quote:
Originally Posted by Wrath
Thank you Zark! We appriciate you keeping us updated on how things are going.
Agreed! Definitely looking forward to getting my hands on that battle simulator as well ;-)Quote:
Originally Posted by Truckingyoda
The most fun I've had in this game is figuring out the rules the hard way, by trying stuff. I've spent way too many hours on this, but that's because it's been a challenge, and I've enjoyed figuring out things before others have, like you can send ships out of your beginning sector, and there are a whole bunch of empty systems in the middle sectors. And there's an extra bonus you can exploit which I don't feel the need to explain, but I will explain to Zark when this game is over.
I'm still trying to decide how I feel about Strongbad's issue. I was on the receiving end of his kind ministrations and I went "hunh ...". The colony he attacked with his 700 ships was a starter colony. His first attack stripped it of all its orbitals, and then I got to watch his second attack, and the colony didn't even lose any population. As for myself, i would chalk that up to a lesson learned and change my strategy accordingly. I know there is some randomness to combat, as I have seen fleets of twenty to thirty cruisers wiped out when attacking an outpost with 2 beam arrays, but I've also seen a fleet of 40 or so cruisers take an outpost with 4 beam arrays with 50% loss. I don't know if this situation involved randomness, or if you just can't take a full size colony without any capital ships, or if it matters that the colony was a "starter" colony.
The problem is that, if 600 or 700 ships of battleship size or smaller can take any fully populated colony, then the military victory is going to happen every time and there's not much point doing anything else. I suspect Zark has done something to make it necessary to do the high level research in order to finish the game, but who knows? The fun for me is figuring it out.
*
Stealth orbitals will stop a 700 ship fleet cold if it doesn't have cloaking. I attacked a colony with 0 apparent defenses with a fleet of not quite 400 battleships - easily enough to capture an undefended colony. Lost the entire fleet to stealth orbitals because if they have it maxed, you can't see the orbitals period, and as long as there's orbitals you can't kill the colony.
I don't mind loosing, I just think player made defenses should be what stops others, not inherit stuff that Is so powerful a dude who haven't done a thing since day one is still invincible 2 weeks later. People get knocked out of the race all the time, that's how this game rolls, keeping them there on life support is meaningless.
It is NOT hard to build a fleet to kill the homeworld of a player who hasn't played since day 1. Its about 2 and a half weeks in on one of my servers and I've built several fleets of 500+ ships. Started with cruisers, then mixed cruisers and battlecruisers, then battleships. I've LOST them all over time, but it's all been either ships lost attacking colonies of a player at war with me before I killed it, or fleets lost to defended planets.
The fact of the matter is you need over 200 Battleshios to take out a 400Mu undefended planet. If he has defenses set up and then abandons the game, you gotta deal with it. Unless you or someone else can come up with a better way to implement Planet defense, without allowing grunt rushing than this is the way it is. I think the next update will solve a lot of people's complaints on both RO collection and Combat.
I'd love to opt out of a few games at this point so that I can concentrate on newer games… clearly there's some major balance issues and until they're addressed it's almost pointless for me to try in current games. I dislike this defeatist attitude, but I don't want to invest too much time into getting wiped because someone is leveraging unbalanced game mechanics vs tactics. Still love the game… just not having a positive experience on one or two servers.
Well, a Researcher won on Aruru, so I'm not sure Traders really are that overpowered. Yes, they can build ships faster than anyone, but they aren't winning games. Not yet at least.
I think the first few games everyone was a gentleman not attacking to much, just learning the ropes. So not surprised that a Researcher could win.Quote:
Originally Posted by ChickenHawk07
In newer games you have to use geurilla warfare to slow down bigger players. You know something if someone takes one of my worlds I may not even know it due to the lack of combat reports. I think all the little players should attack the bigger ones to see how that goes.
I am thinking about attacking one of the bigger players just for the heck of it since it is an older server.
We really need a marking tool to keep track of worlds that we are plaknning to do something.
Perhaps a Territory Map Overview that shows who you've discovered and who owns what.
War is not always the best option. But sure, if you like to see what happens try it and tell us how it went :)Quote:
Originally Posted by GeeWhiz
They're thankfully working on adding a lot of these suggestions already, and with every new and possible suggestion they are doing their best to get it added.
Other than that, attacking and planning attacks has been a blast in my newest server. Irkalla I'm just researching.